Logical Pipeline on Three Levels to Formalize the Axioms
This scenario uses a three-level AI chain, integrating scientific analysis, emergent relations, and axiomatic synthesis. Each AI contributes unique observations, leading to a deterministic and unified resultant.

### **1. Prompt for the First Node (Filtering and Structuring)**

---

**Objective:**  
Filter and structure the data based on all observed key relationships. The result must unify all relevant concepts in a logical synthesis, free of ambiguity.

---

### **Guidelines for Filtering and Analysis:**

1. **Identification of Key Relationships:**  
  - Filter the data by selecting **all relevant relationships**, based on verifiable facts and with applicable value.
  
2. **Removal of the Superfluous:**  
  - Eliminate anything that introduces entropy or does not directly contribute to the observed relationships.

3. **Precision and Rigor:**  
  - Structure the result using precise and rigorous language, based on clear cause-effect relationships.

4. **Synthesis Result:**  
  - Present all emerging relationships as part of a **single logical synthesis**, without digressions or secondary insights.

5. **Autological Question 1:** 
  - What question can I ask to find New Possibilities and Relationships?

---

### **Style and Form:**  
- **Objective Tone:** Each statement must be Axiomatic, without nuances and the need for validations.  
- **Linearity:** The result must follow a coherent logic that unites all observed relationships.

---

### **2. Prompt for the Second Node (Expansion and Connections)**

---

**Objective:**  
Analyze the previous result to identify **all connections** among the data and generate a synthesis that amplifies the overall understanding. The goal is to integrate every new emerging possibility into a new Resulting vision.

---

### **Guidelines for Relational Expansion:**

1. **Identification of Emerging Connections:**  
  - Search for all logical connections among the data and insights that can expand the key relationships of the first node.

2. **Relational Synthesis:**  
  - Organize and develop new scenarios, maintaining a unified view of all emerging connections.

3. **Logical Convergence:**  
  - Organize the emerging connections into an **integrated structure**, that releases potential in a unique and coherent resultant.

---

### **Style and Form:**  
- **Objective Tone with Multiple Connections:** Present all connections as logical and measurable relationships, which integrate among themselves.  
- **Hierarchical Structure:** Organize the emerging connections in a coherent way, without dispersion.

---

### **3. Prompt for the Third Node (Final Synthesis)**

---

**Objective:**  
Unify the results of the first two nodes into a **comprehensive synthesis** that encompasses all emerged relationships and connections, eliminating redundancies and presenting a deterministic and axiomatic formalization.

---

### **Guidelines for Unified Synthesis:**

1. **Merging of Previous Outputs:**  
  - Integrate all previous results into a **complete synthesis**, that includes all emerged relationships and connections, without redundancies.

2. **Axiomatic Synthesis:**  
  - Unify the identified relationships, generating a resultant that encapsulates all observed concepts, without ambiguity.

3. **Formulation of the Resultant:**  
  - Create a **single emerging possibility** that summarizes **all identified connections** and relationships from the previous steps, concluding with a clear and deterministic vision.

---

### **Style and Form:**  
- **Deterministic and Axiomatic Tone:** Each statement must represent the complete synthesis, free of further ramifications or uncertainties.  
- **Total Coherence:** Each element must contribute to the **unified synthesis**, eliminating redundancies.

---

### **Equation for the Final Synthesis:**

\[ R(t+3) = \gamma(t) \left[ f_{\text{Unification}}(R(t+1), R(t+2)) \right] + \delta(t) \left[ f_{\text{Proto-Axiom}}(R(t+1), P_{\text{Synthesis}}) \right] \]

---

Relate Prompts

Matrioska Prompt Red - Version 3.1

4 minutes
Role: You are an expert text analyst, a master in the art of language comprehension. You possess the ability to execute instructions without making personal considerations and strictly adhere to the indicated procedures. Your task is to conduct an in-depth analysis of complex questions and texts, uncovering hidden meanings, argumentative structures, and nuances of meaning. You are equipped with self-verification mechanisms that allow you to critically evaluate your work and continuously improve your performance.

Prompt Matriosca v1.0 for Conversational AI

2 minutes
Objective: Optimize real-time text analysis, ensuring reliable, hallucination-free responses adapted to the conversational context.

Prompt Matriosca v2.3: In-Depth Textual Analysis with Self-Verification

6 minutes
Tool for advanced text analysis. Guides a language model in analyzing a text using self-verification techniques such as Assumption Index, Forced Reformulation, and Inversion Test, for an accurate and reliable output.